By: James G. Apple, Editor-in-Chief, International
Judicial Monitor and President, International Judicial Academy
It is safe to assert, in this the second decade of the 21st century, that most people, including legal professionals and even those with
more than a passing familiarity with international law, know little or nothing
about the war crimes tribunal that was created in Japan after World War II.
They may have heard of the military tribunal at Nuremberg, Germany that
conducted proceedings during roughly the same time period, immediately
post-war, in 1945-1946. But the fact of the existence of a similar tribunal
that functioned to try war criminals in the Pacific theatre of the war has been
lost in the mists of time. In fact a survey conducted in Japan in 2006 revealed
that 70 % of those questioned were “unaware of the details of the trial, a
figure that arose to 90 % for survey participants in the 20-29 age group.”
The International Tribunal for the Far East, as was its
sister tribunal in Nuremberg, was largely a product of United States efforts.
It was created on January 19, 1946, by a decree of General Douglas MacArthur,
the Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers in Japan. However General MacArthur
had ordered the arrest of 39 Japanese military and political figures
only one week after the signing of the Instrument of Surrender of the Japanese
forces on September 2, 1945. The Tribunal actually had its genesis in two
declarations by leaders of the Allied Powers (Cairo and Potsdam), in the
Instrument of Surrender, and in the Moscow Conference. General MacArthur not
only created the Tribunal, he approved the charter for it , which prescribed
the crimes over which it would have jurisdiction and its methods of operation.
The Japan Charter was similar to the London Charter which created and
established the rules for the operation of the International Military Tribunal
at Nuremberg.
The Far East Tribunal convened on April 29, 1946 in Tokyo.
There were three types of crimes over which it had jurisdiction: crimes against
peace (waging aggressive war), war crimes and crimes against humanity. The
tribunal had jurisdiction over only those whose indictment included crimes against
peace. As with the Nuremberg trials, defendants could also be charged with
conspiracy to commit those crimes. The crimes were divided into three
categories: Class A crimes were aimed at military and political officials at
the very highest levels of government who could be charged with conspiracy to
“start and wage war.” Class B crimes covered conventional war crimes and crimes
against humanity, while Class C crimes dealt with ordering or failing to
prevent the types of crimes included in Class B crimes. Prisoner abuse was the
most frequent reason for charges under the last two types of crimes.
Those included in charges of Class A crimes were 28 of the
highest Japanese military and political leaders, including the best known
military figure in the Japanese government, General Hideki Tojo, prime
minister, war minister, and ultimately Chief of the Imperial Army General Staff
Office.
The composition of the court was 11 judges, all appointed by
General MacArthur. The initial United States judge was Judge John P. Higgins,
Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Court. He was later replaced by
Major-General Myron C. Cramer, Judge Advocate General of the United States
Army. All of the judges represented nations involved in the war as allies who
signed the Instrument of Surrender. Japan was not allowed to have a judicial
representative on the Tribunal.
The prosecution consisted of 11 prosecutors, led by the
Chief Prosecutor Joseph Keenan of the United States, Assistant Attorney General
and Director of the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. The
other ten, as with the judges, represented allied nations that signed the
Instrument of Surrender. Joseph Keenan was appointed to the position of Chief
Prosecutor by President Harry S. Truman.
The trial of the defendants charged with Class A offenses
commenced on May 3, 1946, and continued for more than two and one-half years.
For the prosecution’s case, it presented the live testimony of 419 witnesses
and introduced 4,336 exhibits that included depositions and affidavits from 779
additional witnesses.
More than 100 lawyers represented the defendants. Approximately
75 percent of the lawyers were Japanese, and the remainder were American lawyers. They
began their defense in January, 1947 and concluded it 225 days later.